Legal Opinion

Lincoln Bank v. Gem City Wholesale Grocery Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1926No. Appeal, 202PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

In November, 1921, the Lincoln Bank of Erie held the overdue notes of the Gem City Wholesale Grocery Company, a corporation (herein called the Grocery Company), for $3,129.35 and declined to renew or extend the same without added security. Thereupon the Grocery Company took up the old notes with a new judgment note for like amount, on the back of which was the following endorsement: “Erie, Pa.......19... For value received I or we hereby sell, assign, transfer and set over unto the Lincoln Bank of Erie or order all my right, title and interest in the within note,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miners State Bank v. AuksztokalnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. State Camp of Penna. of Patriotic Sons of America v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Homewood Peoples Bank v. HastingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Volk v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Campbell v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pacific Lumber Co. v. RoddSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Bayard v. Pennsylvania Knitting Mills Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Putnam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Broadway Bk. Scottdale v. DiskinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Eclipse, Etc., Bendix Aviation Corp. v. MinterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API