Legal Opinion

Pacific Lumber Co. v. Rodd

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1926No. Appeal, 97PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Sadler,

Thomas Rodd, Jr., defendant, was president of a corporation bearing his name. The latter had extensive business dealings with the Pacific Lumber Company of Illinois, present plaintiff, and became indebted to it for expenses advanced on contract work to the amount of $21,917.55. In 1925, the parties entered into an arrangement to secure payment of the balance due, and for the Rodd Company to continue the sale of the plaintiff product. This understanding was set forth in a letter dated September 25th, addressed to the former, and defendant signified his satisfaction…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kolf v. LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Whitney v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Ward v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Integrity Title Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. RauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. O'Maley v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Harwood v. Bruhn Et UxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Lansdowne Bank & Trust Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. ROSE v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Altoona Trust Co. v. FocklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API