Legal Opinion

Selman v. Shirley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1938Published

1Opinion

Petition for rehearing granted March 28; argued on rehearing April 18; former opinion sustained June 6, 1939

On Rehearing

(91 P. (2d) 312)

ROSSMAN, J.

The brief accompanying the respondents’ (defendants’) petition for a rehearing contends that we erred when we applied in this suit the benefit-of-the-bargain rule. It cites no authorities not mentioned in our previous decision except pages 448 to 454, McCormick on Damages. Our decision quoted from a treatise written by the same author, published in 28 Ill. Law Rev. 1050, which apparently afforded the substance for the above-cited pages of his…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Hotaling v. A. B. Leach & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Selman v. ShirleyOregon Supreme Court · 1938

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API