Selman v. Shirley
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion
Petition for rehearing granted March 28; argued on rehearing April 18; former opinion sustained June 6, 1939
On Rehearing
(91 P. (2d) 312)
ROSSMAN, J.
The brief accompanying the respondents’ (defendants’) petition for a rehearing contends that we erred when we applied in this suit the benefit-of-the-bargain rule. It cites no authorities not mentioned in our previous decision except pages 448 to 454, McCormick on Damages. Our decision quoted from a treatise written by the same author, published in 28 Ill. Law Rev. 1050, which apparently afforded the substance for the above-cited pages of his…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hotaling v. A. B. Leach & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Selman v. ShirleyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.