Legal Opinion

United States v. Juvenile Male

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 20, 2012No. 11-30065PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

A juvenile male appeals the district court’s determination that he is an “Indi an” under 18 U.S.C. § 1153, which provides federal criminal jurisdiction for certain crimes committed by Indians in Indian country. The juvenile claims that he does not identify as Indian, and is not socially recognized as Indian by other tribal members. Nonetheless, he is an enrolled tribal member, has received tribal assistance, and has used his membership to obtain tribal benefits. Because the juvenile is Indian by blood and easily meets three of the most important factors used to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Violet BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. MaggiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. LaBuffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  2. State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  3. State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  4. United States v. LoeraDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API