Legal Opinion

United States v. Maggi

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 16, 2010No. 08-30223, 09-30052PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

The Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153, provides federal criminal jurisdiction for certain crimes committed by Indians in Indian country. As the Supreme Court explained in United States v. Antelope, “we are dealing [ ] not with matters of tribal self-regulation, but with federal regulation of criminal conduct within Indian country implicating Indian interests.” 430 U.S. 641, 646, 97 S.Ct. 1395, 51 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977). Determination of who is an Indian under the statute is not as easy as it might seem. Indeed, the statute contains no definition, leaving to the courts the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  5. United States v. Walter Dale BroncheauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Damien ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Jdt, Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. LaBuffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Damien ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Damien ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API