Marchlen v. Township of Mt. Lebanon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted allocatur in this case to consider a question of first impression, that is, whether stock options issued to an employee pursuant to a stock option plan constitute compensation to the employee that may be taxed by a political subdivision as earned income under the Local Tax Enabling Act (LTEA). 1
Pro se Appellee, Louis Thomas Marchlen, is an employee of the Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA) and a participant in ALCOA’s employee non-qualified stock option plan. 2 On July 6, 1984, Appellee was granted a non-qualified stock option 3 to buy 500 shares of ALCOA…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commissioner v. LoBueSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Board of Property AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Marchlen v. Township of Mt. LebanonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Pugliese v. Township of Upper St. ClairCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
3Cited by11 opinions
- Willacy v. Cleveland Bd. of Income Tax Rev. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- City of Philadelphia v. Tax Review Board of the City of Philadelphia Ex Rel. AboyanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Scott v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Hmelyar v. Phoenix ControlsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- In Re Appeal of Whitpain Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.