Legal Opinion

Marchlen v. Township of Mt. Lebanon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2000No. 67 W.D. Appeal Docket 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted allocatur in this case to consider a question of first impression, that is, whether stock options issued to an employee pursuant to a stock option plan constitute compensation to the employee that may be taxed by a political subdivision as earned income under the Local Tax Enabling Act (LTEA). 1

Pro se Appellee, Louis Thomas Marchlen, is an employee of the Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA) and a participant in ALCOA’s employee non-qualified stock option plan. 2 On July 6, 1984, Appellee was granted a non-qualified stock option 3 to buy 500 shares of ALCOA…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. LoBueSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Board of Property AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Marchlen v. Township of Mt. LebanonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Pugliese v. Township of Upper St. ClairCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Willacy v. Cleveland Bd. of Income Tax Rev. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Tax Review Board of the City of Philadelphia Ex Rel. AboyanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Scott v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Hmelyar v. Phoenix ControlsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. In Re Appeal of Whitpain Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API