Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1984No. 8326SC704PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the admission into evidence of his post-arrest statement that his address was 624-D Billingsly Road. This evidence was admitted over objection and after a voir dire hearing. The trial court ruled that the question put to the defendant as to his address “was a routine preliminary question and did not constitute interrogation.” Defendant contends the question did constitute interrogation and that since it was asked before defendant was advised of his constitutional rights, it was inadmissible. The State concedes that Officer Parker asked defendant his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Cleveland Hines v. J. E. Lavallee, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, NewyorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. LaddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Lusk v. CaseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API