Ayesha Wiley v. Oberlin Police Department
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Ayesha Wiley, pro se, appeals the district court’s decision granting summary judgment to the Defendants — Sandra Houghland, the City of Oberlin, various City police officers, and the City prosecutor — because Wiley did not demonstrate an actionable violation of her constitutional rights. She argues that the district court erred in granting the motion because it made incorrect findings of fact and ignored her constitutional claims. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Wiley alleged that she was living with her ex-fiancé, John…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hooks v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted FallsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Susan Stricker v. Twp. Of CambridgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Muhammad al-Lamadani v. Keith LangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Axis Dynamics v. Knox County TennesseeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Bailey Wooten v. Tara Sturts, et alDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Clark v. Franklin County, KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.