Brown v. J&W Grading, Inc.
United States District Court
1Opinion of the Court
The absence of available documentation describing the relationship between the Plaintiffs and the Technology Defendants and their owners does not overcome the compelling circumstantial evidence that the Plaintiffs have alleged suggesting the existence of an employer-employee relationship. Because the Plaintiffs adequately allege that Synergy, Rivero, ECO IQ, Neilitz, Migo IQ, Kotthoff, and Leese employed them pursuant to the FLSA, this Court denied all motions to dismiss on this ground.
Moreover, the FLSA only applies to employment relationships with a "sufficient nexus to interstate…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Costello v. Molari, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Fine v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- LAUSSER v. ELITE AIRWAY SERVICES LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025
- Perez v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024