Legal Opinion

Eykelboom v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 3, 1922No. 10,274PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Proceedings involving contempt of court. Plaintiff in error adjudged guilty of contempt. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Clarence J. Morley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error was sentenced to the county jail for contempt of court for failure to produce papers as required by a subpoena duces tecum. To review that order he *320brings error and asks the issuance of a supersedeas.

The Denver State Bank was engaged in a general banking business in the city of Denver and The Guaranty Securities Company in negotiating loans and dealing in bonds and securities. The two concerns occupied the same quarters. One Matthews was president of both and plaintiff in error Eykelboom was secretary and manager of the Securities Company and vice-president in charge of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Scott v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Shore v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. United States v. Terminal R.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1906

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re HolbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  2. Fort v. Co-Operative Farmers' ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. People v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. Mainland v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Fawick Airflex Co. v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Local 735Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API