Legal Opinion

United States v. Terminal R.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided October 25, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. On motion of R. M. Fraser to quash subpoena duces tecum.

1Opinion of the Court

FINKELNBURG, District Judge.

The matters now submjtted to the court arise in a suit brought bjr the government of the United States against the Terminal Railroad Association of St. Eouis, the St. Louis Bridge Company, the Merchants’ Bridge Company, the Wiggins Ferry Company, the Merchants’ Terminal Railway Company, and 14 trunk line railroad companies engaged in interstate commerce to and from the city of St. Louis, besides some other parties defendant unnecessary to mention for the purpose of this inqüiry.

The bill of complaint is lengthy. It is largely historical. It recites the history of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890
  3. United States v. BabcockU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1876
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. North Carolina Corp. CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eykelboom v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. United States v. Terminal R. Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API