Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Rodis

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 23, 1957No. Civ. A. 1936-55PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The question presented by the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies in a suit for malpractice against a physician or surgeon.

This action is brought by a husband and wife to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by the latter as a result of an electro-shock treatment administered by the defendant, who is a psychiatrist.

It was stipulated at the pretrial hearing that the female plaintiff was a patient of the defendant, and that he recommended and administered shock treatments to her,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  3. Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Quinley v. CockeTennessee Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Williams v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Hart v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Stottlemire v. CawoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
  5. Mitchell v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API