Legal Opinion

Finnell v. Armoura

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1911No. 2210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Son. ill. L. Ritchie, Judge. Proceedings by Frank Armoura, alias Frank Arima, to quash an execution issued against him on a judgment recovered against him by C. V. Finnell and another, as Finnell & Hutchins. Judgment quashing the execution. Judgment creditors appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

Tbis was a summary proceeding instituted in tbe foregoing action, and based upon a motion to quash an execution wbicb, it is alleged, was issued or based upon a judgment wbicb, for tbe reasons hereinafter stated, was and is unenforceable against tbe respondent.

The undisputed facts, briefly stated, are: That on the 5th day of February, 1907, respondent, under bis name of Frank Arima, filed bis petition in the United States District Court in wbicb, after setting forth the necessary facts, be prayed' to be adjudged a bankrupt and discharged as such. In connection with said petition, be duly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lamborn v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Taylor v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cox v. WelcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Claster v. SobleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Gerecke v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bank of Wrightsville v. Four SeasonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API