Legal Opinion

Bank of Wrightsville v. Four Seasons

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 14, 1917No. 8711PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Dublin — Judge Flynt. • March 10, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

Under the provisions of the bankruptcy act of 1867 (14 Stat. 517), a debt provable in bankruptcy was discharged, though the name of the creditor was omitted from the schedule, if the omission was not wilful nor fraudulent, even though the creditor had no notice or knowledge of the proceedings. Broadway Trust Co. v. Manheim, 14 Am. Bkr. R. 122 (47 Misc. 415, 95 N. Y. Supp. 93); Tyrrel v. Hammerstein, 6 Am. Bk. R. 430 (33 Misc. 505, 67 N. Y. Supp. 717). But under the provisions of the present national bankruptcy act of 1898 (30 Stat. 544), a discharge in bankruptcy releases a bankrupt from all…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tyrrel v. HammersteinNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Custard v. WigdersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Marshall v. English-American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Broadway Trust Co. v. ManheimNew York Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hayer v. ComstockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Company v. Robert L. Weaver, John C. Weaver and Sons and Weaver Farms, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Brooks v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. In Re VensonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964
  4. Tyler v. Jones County BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Bell v. Georgia Chemical WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API