Legal Opinion

Ramsdell v. Fuller

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1865PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Sawyer, J.

On the 13th of November^. 1856, the premises described in the complaint, for a consideration expressed in the deed of $3,000, were conveyed by one George W. Brown to the defendant, Jane E. Fuller, who was then the wife of Silas Fuller. The purchase money was paid out of funds belonging to the separate estate of Mrs. Fuller. On the third day of November, 1859, Silas Fuller, at that time the husband of defendant, Jane E. Fuller (but who was very soon afterward separated from her by a decree of divorce), executed a conveyánce of said premises to L. L. Lawrence. Said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. KinzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lake v. BenderNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  2. In Re Estate of BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Peck v. VandenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Peck v. BrummagimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API