Legal Opinion
Mutsch v. Rigi
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 11, 1988No. C4-88-598Published
1Opinion of the Court
430 N.W.2d 201 (1988)
Luzerne MUTSCH, Respondent,
v.
Iraj RIGI, Appellant.
No. C4-88-598.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
October 11, 1988.
Frederick A. Bohling, Daly, Bohling & O'Connor, Burnsville, for respondent.
Phillip R. Krass, Krass & Monroe Chartered, Shakopee, for appellant.
Heard, considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and NORTON and LESLIE[*], JJ.
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding respondent Luzerne Mutsch money damages due pursuant to a promissory note. The trial court found that misrepresentation had not occurred when Mutsch had merely expressed an opinion and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Telex Corporation v. Data Products CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Lamb Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Kraus-Anderson of Minneapolis, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.