United States v. Kormel, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
This proceeding was instituted by the filing of a Petition for Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should not be Punished for Criminal Contempt. The Order to Show Cause was entered and a trial followed before Honorable John R. Ross, United States District Judge, now deceased, sitting without a jury. The parties have since filed their written consent that the case should be decided by the undersigned on the transcript of the proceedings heretofore had, the evidence and testimony heretofore received and the briefs filed. Having duly considered the same, the Court finds…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Brumby Metals, Inc. v. BargenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- United States v. RobertsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Schwegmann Brothers Giant Super Markets v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Schwegmann Brothers Giant Super MarketsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. North American Finance Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1959
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Los Angeles Land and Investments, Ltd.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1968
- Happy Investment Group v. Lakeworld Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1975
- Husted v. Amrep Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988