Legal Opinion
Husted v. Amrep Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 17, 1977No. 76 Civ. 338PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LASKER, District Judge.
Gladys Husted sues the defendants under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. (ILSFDA) and for common law fraud. The defendants move to dismiss the complaint. Eulalie Bryan, plaintiff in 429 F.Supp. 313, also decided today, sues some (but not all) of the defendants named in Husted on similar grounds. She moves to certify the suit as a class action. Each case is brought as a class action, and the classes sought to be represented are overlapping. The cases are related, 1 and call for construction of identical or related portions…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,975 Michelle K. Tomera, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Arthur T. Galt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Robert Bomba and Annamarie P. Bomba v. W. L. Belvidere, Inc., a General Partner Doing Business as Candlewick Lakes Associates, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Cook v. Deltona Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Bryan v. Amrep Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.