Legal Opinion
United States v. Robertson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 4, 1959PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Novel questions involving the interpretation of the following two penal provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C.A. § 77e(a) (1) and § 77q(a) (1)] are raised by defendants’ motion to dis miss various counts of a twenty-count indictment:
Section 77e(a) (1)
“(a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, it shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly — ■
“(1) to make use of. any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell * * * such security through the use or medium of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Hon. John M. Cashin, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Fidelis Corporation v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Heyman v. HeymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Robert Dahle Sparrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.