Connecticut Motor Cars v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a licensed motor vehicle dealer or repairer (licensee) is entitled, pursuant to § 14-63-36c (c) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, 1 to charge a “gate fee” for the labor and equipment needed to move a wrecked or disabled vehicle from the storage area to the vehicle retrieval area. The plaintiff, Connecticut Motor Cars, a licensee, appeals 2 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its administrative appeal from the decision of the defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner), concluding…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jim's Auto Body v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Board of Selectmen v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dickman v. Office of State Ethics, Citizen's Ethics Advisory BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Mangiafico v. State Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Family Garage, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Modzelewski's Towing & Storage, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
- Modzelewski's Towing & Storage, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.