Legal Opinion

Connecticut Motor Cars v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 19, 2011No. SC 18650PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether a licensed motor vehicle dealer or repairer (licensee) is entitled, pursuant to § 14-63-36c (c) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, 1 to charge a “gate fee” for the labor and equipment needed to move a wrecked or disabled vehicle from the storage area to the vehicle retrieval area. The plaintiff, Connecticut Motor Cars, a licensee, appeals 2 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its administrative appeal from the decision of the defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner), concluding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jim's Auto Body v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Board of Selectmen v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dickman v. Office of State Ethics, Citizen's Ethics Advisory BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Mangiafico v. State Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Family Garage, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Modzelewski's Towing & Storage, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
  5. Modzelewski's Towing & Storage, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API