Legal Opinion
Thermoglaze, Inc. v. Morningside Gardens Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 15, 1991No. 8846PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court accepting the report of the attorney trial referee. On appeal, the defendant claims that the attorney trial referee improperly found facts contrary to the evidence presented and improperly concluded that an alleged amendment to the parties’ contract was unsupported by consideration. We disagree with the defendant and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Evidence presented to the attorney trial referee supports the following facts. The plaintiff, Thermoglaze, Inc., a corporation in the business of furnishing and installing windows,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State National Bank v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Warren v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lamb v. Emhart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Keefe v. Norwalk Cove Marina, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Willamette Management Associates, Inc. v. PalczynskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- New England Rock Services, Inc. v. Empire Paving, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Urich v. FishConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.