Campbell v. Connor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*629WHICHARD, Judge.
Respondents contend the court erred in denying their motion for a directed verdict made at the close of petitioner’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. A motion for a directed verdict must state the specific grounds therefor. N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 50(a). The record does not include either a written statement of the grounds for the motion or a transcript of oral arguments made in support of the motion. See Hensley v. Ramsey, 283 N.C. 714, 726, 199 S.E. 2d 1, 8 (1973). As petitioner does not raise this omission, however, and both parties argue the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Warlick v. . LowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Candler v. SluderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Oshita v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Davis v. Forsyth CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Campbell v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Richards v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010