Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Connor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1985No. 8522SC103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*629WHICHARD, Judge.

Respondents contend the court erred in denying their motion for a directed verdict made at the close of petitioner’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. A motion for a directed verdict must state the specific grounds therefor. N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 50(a). The record does not include either a written statement of the grounds for the motion or a transcript of oral arguments made in support of the motion. See Hensley v. Ramsey, 283 N.C. 714, 726, 199 S.E. 2d 1, 8 (1973). As petitioner does not raise this omission, however, and both parties argue the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Warlick v. . LowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Candler v. SluderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Oshita v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Davis v. Forsyth CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Campbell v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Richards v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API