Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Connor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1985No. 8522SC103Published

1Opinion of the Court

335 S.E.2d 788 (1985)

C.A. CAMPBELL

v.

Evelyn CONNOR and husband, Jack Connor, and John T. Henderson.

No. 8522SC103.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 5, 1985.

Pope, McMillan, Gourley & Kutteh by William H. McMillan, Statesville, for petitioner-appellee.

McElwee, McElwee, Cannon & Warden by E. Bedford Cannon, Statesville, for respondent-appellants.

WHICHARD, Judge.

Respondents contend the court erred in denying their motion for a directed verdict made at the close of petitioner's evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. A motion for a directed verdict must state the specific…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Warlick v. . LowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Candler v. SluderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Oshita v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API