Legal Opinion

Haverty Furniture Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided August 18, 1922No. 562PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Law. Action by the Haverty Furniture Company against the United States. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, District Judge.

The tax sought to be recovered was collected under the Revenue Act of 4918, Schedule A 6 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6318p), which lays a stamp tax of 2 cents per $100 on “drafts or checks, * * * promissory notes, except bank notes issued for circulation, and for each renewal of the same.” The instruments here involved are claimed to be “promissory notes.” They begin with the words, “This agreement witnesseth that I,-, have this day purchased from the Haverty Furniture Company,” and conclude with the words, “This writing is the whole contract and no verbal statements…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brunton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Metropolis Publishing Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Bankers' Trust Co. v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1934
  5. Nelson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API