Bankers' Trust Co. v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STRUM, District Judge.
While the court can specifically pass upon the taxability only of the contract which is now before it, an expression of the reasons for the court’s ruling may be helpful in preventing further controversy between the parties.
Certain cardinal principles, from which there has been no departure, in the construction of documentary stamp tax acts, were laid down in United States v. Isham, 17 Wall. (84 U. S.) 496, 21 L. Ed. 728, amongst which are:
1. The liability of an instrument for a stamp duty, as well as the amount of such duty, is determined by the form and face of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Lee v. BickellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Edwards v. Wabash Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- State v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Florida · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maas Brothers, Inc. v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Lee v. KenanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Maas Bros., Inc. v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Maas Bros., Inc. v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966