Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nelson v. Watson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 28, 1933Published

1DissentBrown, J.

(dissenting). — It is clear that the statute in question places no tax on oral contracts. The pertinent portion of the statute, as applying to this case, is quoted in the majority opinion. It shows that the Legislature has provided that a ten-cent stamp shall be affixed to all written obligations to pay money on each $100.00 of the indebtedness or obligation evidenced thereby. Under this' portion of the statute, no stamps need be affixed to the instrument here in. question unless it is either a written obligation to pay money, or a mortgage which incorporates the certificate of indebtedness…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Malone v. MeresSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. American Process Co. v. Florida White Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Voges Motor Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  5. Holmberg v. Hardee TrusteesSupreme Court of Florida · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API