Legal Opinion

Back Country Horsemen of America v. Johanns

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 19, 2006No. Civil Action No. 05-0960 (ESH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Back Country Horsemen (BCHA) seeks to recover attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. BCHA previously brought suit asking the Court to review an action taken by the United States Forest Service (“Agency”) for violations of the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), Pub.L. No. 940588, 90 Stat. 2949 (codified as amended at 16 U.S.C. § 1604, 1612), and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq. The Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Federal Election Commission v. Congressman Charles G. RoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. Brigadier General Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Ronald Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. F.J. Vollmer Company, Inc. v. John W. Magaw, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, U.S. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Slater v. Town of Exeter et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  2. BACK COUNTRY HORSEMEN OF AMERICA v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API