Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1975No. 49435PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of burglary with intent to commit theft. After the jury returned the guilty verdict, the court assessed the punishment at twelve years.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Archie Wagoner, the manager of an apartment complex, after receiving a telephone tip about a burglary, went to investigate. When he arrived at the apartment, he found that the door had been splintered. Appellant was in the hall with a camera and television set in his hands. They belonged to the victim, Cedric King. Appellant stated that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. ShuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Walthall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Mauldin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Harryman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API