Legal Opinion
Harryman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 23, 1975No. 49309PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the possession of heroin. Punishment was assessed at life.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Appellant contends that his arrest was not based on probable cause, and therefore the evidence obtained from him was inadmissible.
Assuming the objection was sufficient, the legality of the arrest and the introduction of heroin found as a result of the subsequent search will be discussed.
Sandra Wood, assistant manager of the Oak Cliff Travel Lodge, testified that the guest in Room 30 was registered as Chuck Walter. They tried…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Etheridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Moraguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Gearing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Denison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.