Legal Opinion

Magnuson v. Bouck

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1926No. 25,057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. The action was commenced in September, 1922, to recover $9,000 past due upon a contract for the sale of land in Aitkin county. The action was tried in October, 1923, and a verdict returned in favor of defendants in the sum of $6,000. Judgment was entered September 22, 1924. In their answer respondents admitted the execution of the contract and the payment of $6,000 thereon as alleged in the complaint. They further set up fraud and deceit on the part of appellants and their agents in the sale of land, rescission, and ask for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Bryant v. LivermoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  3. Nichols v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Hilton v. SouthwickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1840
  5. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lynch v. KleindolphSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Brecht v. Town of BergenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Youngquist v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Magnuson v. BouckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Hillius v. Nelson Hotel Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API