Legal Opinion

Hillius v. Nelson Hotel Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1933No. 29,153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIBELL, Justice.

Action to recover damages for fraud alleged to have been practiced upon the plaintiff in the sale of a hotel property in Moorhead. Certain findings were submitted to the jury, which were found favorably to the defendants. The court then made conclusions of law for the defendants. The plaintiff moved for a new trial on various grounds. The ones important here are the ones mentioned in G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9325(1, 2), .referring generally to irregularities in the proceedings at the trial and misconduct of the jury. The court granted a new trial. The defendants appeal.

What…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rush v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Hewitt v. Pioneer-Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  3. Koehler v. ClearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  4. State v. SnowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. State v. SalversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Randall v. Goodrich-Gamble Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Engstrom v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Randall v. Goodrich-Gamble Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API