Legal Opinion

Crutchfield v. Dailey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 19, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Complaint on note. . Before Judge Turnbull. Walker superior court. February term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Chief Justice.

1, 2. Crutchfield applied to Dailey, the agent of a life insurance company, for a policy of life insurance, and at the same time gaYe his note for the premium thereon. The morning after the application was made, he met Dailey and told him that he wished the application to stop where it was, that he did not want it to go any further. Dailey replied that he had sent the application on to Atlanta, and would write and get the note returned, and give it back to him; *463that “the affair will stop just where it is at; there will be nothing more of it.” He did not receive the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Kelly v. BlissWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Lynch v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McCreery v. DayNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fernandes v. TenbruggencateHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Pope v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Hoffman v. Franklin Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Holloway v. GiddensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Loadman v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API