Legal Opinion

Fernandes v. Tenbruggencate

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1982No. 8050PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant, Councilman William Fernandes (hereinafter cited as appellant), appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Jan Tenbruggencate and the Honolulu Advertiser (hereinafter cited as appellees of Tenbruggencate and Advertiser respectively), in a defamation action. For reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

Appellant initiated this action in response to a series of árdeles published by the Advertiser which allegedly injured appellant’s reputation for honesty and integrity, subjecting appellant to the criticism, scorn, and mistrust of his…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sprouse v. Clay Communication, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Cahill v. Hawaiian Paradise Park CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cochran v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Schermerhorn v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. FranklinNevada Supreme Court · 1958

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Partington v. BugliosiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Dunlea v. DappenHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Partington v. BugliosiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. GECC Financial Corp. v. JaffarianHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API