Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Giddens

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 8, 1977No. 32203PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

Holloway, the proposed buyer, sought specific performance of his alleged contract with Giddens for the sale of land. The trial court entered summary judgment for Giddens, and Holloway appeals.

It is generally true that on appeal the burden lies on appellant to show error; but where summary judgment has been granted the record must be adequate to show affirmatively that no substantial question of fact remained, or else the entry of the judgment will be reversed on appeal. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, 56-1554 et seq. (1976).

The order appealed from stated that it was based upon (1)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Pope v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Shoup v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Kirk v. First Georgia Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Interstate Financial Corp. v. AppelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. FrachiseurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Claxton v. Small Business Administration of the United States GovernmentDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
  3. Brooks v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Fidelity National Bank v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Whitley v. DittaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API