Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 26, 2008No. 05 Civ. 0376(CM)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McMAHON, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff James Murphy brings this action against his former employer, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), alleging a series of injuries sustained by Murphy prior to his retirement in 2006, and seeking to hold the MTA liable under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). The MTA now moves this court for summary judgment as to all claims.

Defendant’s motion is granted in part, and denied in part.

II. Background

Plaintiff James Murphy is a retired…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. I.M. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Ballard v. Union Pacific R. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Curran v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Caminero v. Metropolitan Trans.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  5. Cruz v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API