State v. Hiber
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Justice.
This action was brought by the State to prevent the defendants from impounding water on certain lands in Johnson County, Wyoming. All of the defendants except Frank Hiber filed a disclaimer of interest and Frank Hiber will hereinafter be generally referred to as the defendant. The petition alleges that the defendant owns the SE¼ of Section 27, T. 46 N., R. 79; that one T. H. Adamson is the owner of the SW¼ of Section 35 in the same township and range; that Adamson Draw runs through the land of the defendant and of T. H. Adamson in a northwesterly and southeasterly direction;…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1891
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Heller v. Fire Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Loosli v. HesemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProebstelArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Bower v. Big Horn Canal Ass'n.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.