Legal Opinion

Harper v. Lichtenberger

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1939No. 3277Published

1Opinion

On the Merits

Clifford A. Jones, Roland H. Wiley and Harry T. Young, for Appellant:

In order to allege a cause of action for the forfeiture against appellant, the complaint must aver sufficient facts to show that appellant had substantially violated the terms and conditions of the agreement; that notice of such violations had been served upon appellant; that more than sixty days had elapsed after service of such notice; that appellant continued such substantial violations, and that such violations resulted in damage to respondent. The only statement contained in the complaint with reference to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Durkee v. CotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Paterson v. CondosNevada Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Nielsen v. RebardNevada Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Deiss v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API