Harper v. Lichtenberger
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion
On the Merits
Clifford A. Jones, Roland H. Wiley and Harry T. Young, for Appellant:
In order to allege a cause of action for the forfeiture against appellant, the complaint must aver sufficient facts to show that appellant had substantially violated the terms and conditions of the agreement; that notice of such violations had been served upon appellant; that more than sixty days had elapsed after service of such notice; that appellant continued such substantial violations, and that such violations resulted in damage to respondent. The only statement contained in the complaint with reference to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Durkee v. CotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Paterson v. CondosNevada Supreme Court · 1934
- Nielsen v. RebardNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Deiss v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.