Deiss v. Southern Pacific Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
It is earnestly urged that the complaint in this action does not charge the defendants, or either of them, with actionable negligence, and hence that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. We desire to call the court's attention to two well-established rules dealing with the pleading of negligence: (1) Unless the failure to act, upon which a plaintiff bases his right to recover, is negligent per se, or unless said failure excludes any hypothesis other than that of negligence, a complaint which merely sets forth the said failure does not state a cause of action…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Banks v. Morris CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Baker v. ShafterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mann's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Armstrong v. OnufrockNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- Cox v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1936
- Parks v. GarrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Wiley v. CookNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Ferris v. Albright's Courtesy Electric Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.