Paterson v. Condos
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Coleman, J.:
A petition for a rehearing has been filed, in which it is urged that the plaintiff not having pleaded an abandonment of the express contract found by the trial court to have been entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant, the findings, judgment, and decree were ill-advised, and without justification.
1. This point was not made in the trial court and cannot be urged in this court for the first time. Sherman v. Dilley, 3 Nev. 21-27; McLeod v. Lee, 17 Nev. 103-120, 28 P. 124.
2. For another, and perhaps a better reason, the petition for a rehearing should…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of AppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- McLeod v. LeeNevada Supreme Court · 1882
- Sherman v. DilleyNevada Supreme Court · 1867
- Sweeney v. SchultesNevada Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ormachea v. OrmacheaNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- Agricultural Insurance Co. of Watertown v. BiltzNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Strohecker v. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1934
- Young Electric Sign Co. v. Erwin Electric Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Wittenberg v. WittenbergNevada Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.