Legal Opinion

State v. Ewers, 07 Ca-A 10 0053 (1-2-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 2009No. 07 CA-A 10 0053PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant appeals the imposition of consecutive sentences on three counts of endangering children. Appellant argues that the three consecutive sentences, which amounts to a thirteen year period of incarceration, is contrary to law in that is does not conform to the purposes and principles of sentencing as set forth in R.C. 2929.11 and2929.12 and is unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment.

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND CASE

{¶ 2} Appellant was charged with three counts of endangering children in violation of R.C. 2919.22(A), third degree felonies1, two counts of permitting child…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. EwersOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API