Legal Opinion

Halim v. Donovan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0384PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Ahmad Halim (“Halim”) and his son Sharif Abdelhalim (“Abdelhalim”) (together “Plaintiffs”), each proceeding pro se, commenced this action against Shaun Donovan, Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and the city manager, mayor, and several members of the city council of the City of Henderson, North Carolina (the “City Defendants”), alleging discrimination based on nationality and religion in relation to contracts for several properties owned or desired to be owned by Halim and/or Halim together…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Amerijet International, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Walton v. Secretary Veterans AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016
  3. Eggink v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. (PS) Engel v. Paragon Systems, IncDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Agbara v. At&t Mobility LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API