Legal Opinion

Kirk v. J. S. Kimball Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1907No. S.F. No. 3828PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Page, McCutchen & Knight, and C. E. Wilson, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover the sum of ten thousand dollars for damages alleged to have been sustained by him through the failure of the de fendant, a common carrier of passengers, to transport Mm from San Francisco to the city of Dawson, Alaska. The case was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of six thousand dollars. Upon motion for a new trial the amount of the verdict was reduced by the court to two thousand seven hundred and thirty dollars, wMch reduction was accepted by the plaintiff and a new trial denied. Judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Boylan v. Hot Springs RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Jones v. CortesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Warner & Wife v. Steamship Uncle SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allred v. Bekins Wide World Van ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Scates v. Canvas Decoy Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API