Legal Opinion
Blackfield v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 1966No. Civ. 22444PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Defendants-insurers appeal from a judgment declaring that the insurance policy issued by them to plaintiff s-respondents obligated appellants to defend an action for damages brought against respondents by the McLaughlins, husband and wife.
For reasons stated hereafter we do not determine at this time what obligation, if any, appellants may ultimately have to indemnify respondents in the event that the McLaughlins are successful in their action.
The present evidentiary record consists only of the McLaughlins’ second amended complaint, the appellants' denial of coverage and refusal to defend the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Eichler Homes, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Maxon v. Security Insurance of New Haven ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Firco, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. ReederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Val's Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Paramount Properties Co. v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.