In Re Weinberg
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petitioner, against whom eight indictments were returned August 2, 1916, for the crime of murder, and who is in custody under such of the indictments as have not been dismissed, and one upon which he was tried and acquitted, instituted this proceeding for the purpose of obtaining his admission to bail. He is alleged to have been one of the participants in the bomb outrage in connection with the preparedness parade on July 22, 1916, described in our opinion in the case of People v. Mooney, ante, p. 642, [171 Pac. 690], and by the indictments he was charged with the murder of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- In re TroiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Ex Parte McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Ex parte CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re NordinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Kilpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- In re White, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In Re NordinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- In re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.