Legal Opinion

In re Troia

California Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1883PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Application for writ of habeas.corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Per curiam

The petitioner was committed by a magistrate to answer to a charge of murder. His application is that he be permitted to give bail.

A witness, one William Rafferty, testified at the examination before the magistrate, he saw petitioner kill his wife, under circumstances such as would constitute murder in the first degree. It is claimed that petitioner should be admitted to bail because the testimony before the magistrate, taken as a ivholc, shows that Rafferty swore falsely in respect to material matters, and that his testimony should be rejected.

But while there was testimony with respect to…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DuffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Fountaine v. MullenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  4. In Re ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Ex parte CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API