Legal Opinion
Alsea Veneer, Inc. v. State of Oregon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 9, 1992No. 88C-11289, 88C-11300 CA A68787 (Control), CA A68788PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered after a consolidated trial in which three of their cases went to the jury, which found that defendants were not hable for breach of contract. The errors assigned on appeal relate primarily to pretrial rulings.
The Industrial Accident Fund (IAF) is a statutory “trust fund exclusively for the uses and purposes declared in [ORS 656.001 to ORS 656.794],” which relate to workers’ compensation. ORS 656.634(1). 1 The State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation (SAIF), an “independent public corporation,” provides workers’ compensation insurance to employers.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Bernard v. First National Bank of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Newman v. Tualatin Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Frohnmayer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Deloitte & Touche LLP v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Ballinger v. Klamath Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Alsea Veneer, Inc. v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Safeway, Inc. v. Oregon Public Employees UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Froeber v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.