United States v. Lubell
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.
The government has filed a motion requesting a pre-trial ruling on the admissibility of certain hearsay testimony pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)(C) and 12(d). For the reasons set forth below, the Court exercises its discretion and declines to rule on the admissibility of this testimony prior to trial.
I. Background
The government alleges that the Defendants Shane O’Hearn, George Lubell and Phillip Watson committed various crimes in connection with the following events. In early 1997, Watson’s home was robbed of some 60 pounds of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. InnamoratiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.