Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elder & Johnston Co. v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1952No. 32622Published

1DissentTaft, J.

In recent years, this court *448has been, required to determine whether, in numerous diverse factual situations, “the purpose of the consumer” was “to use or consume the thing transferred directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale by manufacturing, processing * * * mining * * * farming, agriculture, * * *; or directly in making retail sales or directly in the rendition of a public utility service; * * * or to use or consume the thing directly in industrial cleaning of tangible personal property,” within the meaning of those words as set forth in Section 5546-1, General…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Terteling Bros. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. France Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API