Legal Opinion

O.K. Precision Tool & Die Co. v. Wells

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBSON, Justice.

This is a workers’ compensation case. The question is what principle controls apportionment of liability to the Special Fund where the Board finds that the employee has a “condition” which “is a result of her many years of work and should be classified as a gradual type of injury.”

The employee, Dora Goble, developed a condition diagnosed as lateral epicondylitis, an inflammation of the tensor muscles near the elbow, more commonly known as “tennis elbow,” caused by fifteen years of assembly line work imparting torque to a screwdriver. Her condition became disabling on August…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Transport Motor Express, Inc. v. FinnKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Haycraft v. Corhart Refractories Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Yocom v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  4. Southern Kentucky Concrete Contractors, Inc. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983
  5. National Stores, Inc. v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beale v. Faultless HardwareKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Alcan Foil Products v. HuffKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hale v. CDR Operations, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Derr Construction Co. v. BennettKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wells v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API