Legal Opinion

Hale v. CDR Operations, Inc.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2015No. 2014-SC-000062-WC; 2014-SC-000066-WCPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

JUSTICE BARBER

Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Ronnie Hale was employed by Appellee/Cross-Appel-lant, CDR Operations, Inc., for approximately three months as a bulldozer operator. Before that, Hale had worked as a bulldozer operator for various other employers for approximately 30 years. Hale filed a workers’ compensation claim against CDR alleging cumulative trauma and an injury date of February 7, 2012. The parties subsequently stipulated that date at the Benefit Review Conference (“BRC”). Relying on Dr. Madden, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) concluded that Hale…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Osborne v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  2. Wolf Creek Collieries v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
  3. Caudill v. Maloney's Discount StoresKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Magic Coal Co. v. FoxKentucky Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Austin Powder Company v. Billy Keith StacyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Austin Powder Company v. Billy Keith StacyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Bill Wilder v. Muhlenberg County Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
  4. Cheryl Blaine v. Downtown Redevelopment Authority, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Cheryl Blaine v. Downtown Redevelopment Authority, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API